Complaint filed against Chairman, Lokayukta, Odisha before Governor, Odisha

 

Complaint
under Section 37 (4)(c) of Odisha Lokayukta Act 2014

 To                                                                                                                                                          Date- 
26.7.21

His
Excellency Prof. Ganeshi Lal

Hon’ble
Governor, Odisha

Raj
Bhawan, Bhubaneswar

 

Sub-
Seeking action against Chairman Odisha  
Lokayukta Justice Ajit  Singh  under Section 37 (4)(c) of Odisha   Lokayukta 
Act,  2014

 Ref: Order of
Odisha  Lokayukta No. LY- 1027/2020 dated
9.7.21  issued by a Lokayukta Bench
comprising Justice Ajit Singh Chairperson and  
Sri Debabrata Swain, Member.   

 Esteemed Sir,

 I,  Sri Sarbeswar
Behura , RTI Activist  and
anti-corruption crusader , faced bomb attack due to my fight against corruption
of powerful people  would like to draw
attention of your august office  the
following complaint and take action deemed proper by way of exercising  your power under Section 37( (4) (c ) of the
said Act-

 1.   
In order to apprise your august
office on the rationale of the above complaint I    beg 
to narrate a summary of the facts and circumstances that made us to file
it before your esteemed authority and I fervently hope that your august office
shall pass an appropriate order in the matter to meet the ends of justice and
probity.

 2.   
On 28th
night of August, 20, Electronics media 
aired  breaking news  that  
the Irrigation Embankment 
Road  from NH-5  ( Gokarneswar )  to Budhalingam Majhipada Road ( length-20
kms)  along embankment  of Kelua river  under Jajpur district  got destroyed 
at Niraghat by  explosion of
dynamites  and  impression 
was  given  that 
due  to  heavy flow 
of flood  water ,  the 
embankment  got   cracked 
and  damaged and  damaged 
4000  hect. of   paddy. 
After  few hours , the  statement 
of the then District Collector, Jajpur 
and  then Chief Secretary
came  out 
that this  damage  was 
man-made and destroyed by miscreants. On 29.8.21, the Deputy Executive
Engineer, Jaraka Irrigation Division, Jaraka filed FIR in Dharmashala Police
station for inquiry into the incident.

 3.   
Alleging of destruction of
embankment, a conspiracy to cover up huge irregularities and corruption in
construction of the   road, I filed
complaint dt. 7.9.20 before Lokayukta, Odisha seeking inquiry into destruction
of embankment and punish the people responsible for it.

 4.   
My allegation was following
information obtained under RTI Act. That, t
his  project 
was  sanctioned in 2016  by the 
office of  the  Executive Engineer,  R&B, Panikoili Division   with Agreement No. 21 P with an
estimated  amount  of Rs. 21.99 
crores. Sri Balakrustan Mohanty, Contractor was entrusted to execute the
work and complete it  by 30.4.2018. But,
the  local MLA Sri Pranab
Balabantaray   and  Sri Naren Jena, Junior Engineer close  relation of 
MLA     used  local 
hooligans  to  create 
trouble  for  the 
Contractors  for  which 
he  could  not 
start  the  work. 
The work got  delayed  for 
two years and  the  project 
cost   revised  to  Rs.
24.47 crore. Huge corruption and misappropriation of fund resulted in low
quality  of work and weak embankment .

5.   
In order  to suppress 
low  quality  of 
work,   then then Tahasildar,
Dharmashala  and then Executive Engineer,
R&B, Panikoili Division put  a check
post at entry side of embankment in 2020  in order to check movement  of big vehicles apprehending that  it may damage embankment taking plea  that this check post  was put 
at  the instruction of  Collector, Jajpur  which was 
false , confirmed as per RTI Reply given 
by the  office of Collector,
Jajpur which stated that no such had been issued to Tahasildar, Dharmashala.

 6.   
Taking  cognizance 
of  the  complaint ( registered –LY- 1027/20) ,  Lokayukta Bench comprising  Chairman Justice Ajit Singh   and Sri Debabrata Swain, Member issued  notice on  to 
Chief Engineer, works, Sri Pranab Balabantaray, MLA, Executive Engineer,
R&B, Panikoili  to reply  on above-mentioned  allegation.

 7.   
After considering their respective
submissions, on 8.1.21,  the Lokayukta  ordered 
to state Vigilance  for  inquiry into complaints filed by Sarbeswar
Behura.

 8.   
On 7.7.21, the  Director 
of State Vigilance  submitted  preliminary 
report before  Lokayukta, Odisha.

 9.   
Considering  the 
report, Lokayukta Stated 
that  the  allegation of corruption made  in the 
complaint  regarding  use of substandard  material 
in the  construction  work 
of embankment  have been
found  to be  false and 
closed  the  case on 9.7.21.

 10.  
During  hearing 
of the case, when I sought 
the  inquiry  report 
of State Vigilance,  the  Lokayukta bench  denied 
to share  the  copy 
of the  inquiry  report 
on the  ground that  there 
is no  such  provision 
for  sharing  of the 
report  to  complainant 
in Odisha Lokayukta Act, 2014.

 11.  
It 
deserves to  mention here  that 
during  inquiry  conducted by Vigilance, I had  presented 
some  documents  obtained under RTI  from the 
office  of Executive Engineer,
R&B, Panikioli dt. 28.9.20  – (A)  the office 
of Executive Engineer, R&B, Panikoili  had 
deducted Rs. 1.52  crore  from the 
final  bill  of 
Contractor  towards royalty  against 
use  of  sand, stone 
and Morum . In fact,  this  royalty 
should be  deposited  in the 
office  of Tahasildar,
Dharmashala  at the  time 
of lift  of said materials.
As  not 
a single  material  has been lifted  and used 
in the embankment, the  
contractor  had  not 
deposited  the said  royalty 
amount  in the  office of Tahasildar, Dharmashala  and 
misappropriated  the said money.
(B) As  the  construction work  was  going
on  the 
revised  estimated  budget 
of  Rs. 24.47  crore, the 
office  of Executive Engineer , R
&B,  sanctioned  F 2 
work  worth Rs. 63.12  lakhs ( 
dividing work  into 12  sanctioning Rs. 3 to 4 lakh for each work)   to
Lalita Mohanty of  Puri district , a
lady  which is no way related  to this work without any tender. This total amount
was misappropriated as there was no such provision for F-2 work when the work
was going on.  (C)  this 
work  was  primarily 
was handed  over to  Batakrustan 
Mohanty , contractor  who could
not  undertake  the work 
and  his  son 
Subash Mohanty  obtaining
power  of 
attorney  started  the 
work  and  could not 
progress. He engaged another contractor Sangram keshari Jena of
Kendrapara  to  finish 
the work.   But 
the  Vigilance  during 
inquiry  did  not 
take  into  consideration the   above documents submitted by me.

 12.  
When  I raised 
these  issues   that 
has not been taken  into  consideration by Vigilance, Odisha ,
Lokayukta  did not  listen 
anything and arbitrarily 
closed  the case.

 In view of the facts and circumstances narrated
above, we are of the view that 
Justice  Sri Ajit Singh,
Chairperson, Lokayukta has patently failed to discharge his statutory
obligations as required of him. We therefore pray before your Excellency Sir to
order an action deemed proper against Justice Sri Ajit Singh Chairman
Lokayukta, Odisha on the ground of mental infirmity in exercise of the powers
vested in Governor Odish under Section 37(4)(c) and simultaneously to pass
another Order deemed appropriate, in the capacity of Executive Head of the
State under Article 154(1) of Constitution, for institution of an  impartial and comprehensive enquiry covering
all the parties mentioned in our Complaint  
and exploring all angles thereto, so as to unearth the factors and
actors responsible for  destruction of embankment
and corruption involved  in it .   

 Yours  sincerely

 Sarbeswar Behura

At-Saroi, Post-Haridaspur

Dist-Jajpur

M- 9437459949